Katherine Sebov vs Lea Ma Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do second serve statistics influence match predictions between Sebov and Ma? Ma outperforms Sebov slightly, winning 38.94% of points compared to Sebov's 37.08%.
• When examining return game statistics over the past six months, Ma also holds an advantage, winning 49.9% of points on their opponent's second serve, compared to Sebov's 45.81%.
• Sebov has an edge in first serve return stats, winning 40.65% of points, while Ma manages just 29.99%.
• Under high-pressure situations, Ma excels in saving breakpoints, with a rate of 50.88%, whereas Sebov saves 45.09%.
• Looking at their overall match performance over the past year, Ma has a marginally higher win rate at 63.79% compared to Sebov's 63.16%.
• Both players perform best on indoor hard courts, with Sebov winning 68% of matches, slightly better than Ma's 64% on the same surface.
• Their performance in Challengers/ITF tournaments shows Sebov winning 64.15%, nearly matching Ma at 63.79%.
• Sebov faces higher-ranked opponents on average (rank 340.39) than Ma (rank 383.03), which could suggest greater experience against stronger competitors.
• How do they perform in deciding set situations? Ma has a higher win rate of 56% in deciding sets compared to Sebov's 50%.
• Ma converts more breakpoint chances, at 48.11%, signaling efficiency in critical moments, surpassing Sebov's 38.67% conversion rate.

Editorial Prediction (June 5, 2025, UTC):

Considering recent performance metrics, Ma's superior statistics in second serve and return games offer a distinct advantage in this matchup. Ma's ability to save breakpoints more effectively reinforces their high-pressure play.

Despite Sebov's stronger first serve returns and experiences against higher-ranked opponents, Ma's consistent break point conversions and higher deciding set win rate enhance their likelihood of success.

Both players excel on indoor hard surfaces, but Ma's marginally superior match win percentage combined with efficient critical point play positions them as the likely winner in the upcoming encounter.